Consumer-law review for subscription paywalls
One screenshot in, one verdict out, in the law of every market you sell in.
Reviewed against
Method
Submission
One screenshot of the paywall as someone actually sees it, plus the context that makes it readable: the ad hooks that drive traffic there, your markets, and how billing and cancellation really work.
Session in progress
Ten nodes work the submission. A scope gate confirms it is a paywall, an examiner reads the pixels, five pattern checks run in parallel, then the dossier routes the law of each market you sell in.
Verdict
Issues foundRisk
A fixed eight-section report. Every finding carries the norm it breaches, the liability it creates, the correction that closes it, and a confidence line stating what could not be established.
Coverage
In scope
Out of scope
Scope
The patterns on the screen, the law they breach, and what a breach can cost.
Each pattern carries detection cues and false-positive traps, so a finding rests on what the screen shows, not on a label.
No client material is used to train models, and nothing is sold to data brokers.
Screenshots are kept as paywall examples only, and detached from your account on request.
Every finding cites its norm so your counsel can check the reasoning, not trust it.
Open source
The council itself is open source under MIT: the engine that reads a paywall, the pattern catalogue, the legal norms, the routing between them and the tests that hold each verdict to its sources. Read how a finding is reached, run it yourself, or disagree with it in the open.
Five rounds are credited the moment you sign up. A review takes about a minute and is saved to your history, with no card and no sales call.
Sign up and start